3-Methyl-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazole

Cat.NO.:A301089 Purity:98%

Product Details of [ 10010-93-2 ]

CAS No. :	10010-93-2
Formula :	C₅H₅F₃N₂
M.W :	150.10
SMILES Code :	FC(C1=CC(C)=NN1)(F)F
MDL No. :	MFCD00829309
InChI Key :	DLCHCAYDSKIFIN-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :	139077

Safety of [ 10010-93-2 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:	Warning
Hazard Statements:	H315-H319-H335
Precautionary Statements:	P261-P305+P351+P338

Computational Chemistry of [ 10010-93-2 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms	10
Num. arom. heavy atoms	5
Fraction Csp3	0.4
Num. rotatable bonds	1
Num. H-bond acceptors	4.0
Num. H-bond donors	1.0
Molar Refractivity	28.56
TPSA ? Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.	28.68 Å²

Lipophilicity

Log P_o/w (iLOGP)? iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.	1.05
Log P_o/w (XLOGP3)? XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry	1.54
Log P_o/w (WLOGP)? WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.	2.89
Log P_o/w (MLOGP)? MLOGP: Topological method implemented from Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull. Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull. Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.	1.17
Log P_o/w (SILICOS-IT)? SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com	2.43
Consensus Log P_o/w? Consensus Log P_o/w: Average of all five predictions	1.81

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):? ESOL: Topological method implemented from Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.	-2.04
Solubility	1.35 mg/ml ; 0.00902 mol/l
Class? Solubility class: Log S scale Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly	Soluble
Log S (Ali)? Ali: Topological method implemented from Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.	-1.75
Solubility	2.66 mg/ml ; 0.0177 mol/l
Class? Solubility class: Log S scale Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly	Very soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)? SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com	-2.49
Solubility	0.486 mg/ml ; 0.00324 mol/l
Class? Solubility class: Log S scale Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly	Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption? Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg	High
BBB permeant? BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg	Yes
P-gp substrate? P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set) and tested on 415 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77 External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94	No
CYP1A2 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set) and tested on 3000 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90 External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91	No
CYP2C19 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set) and tested on 3000 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86 External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87	No
CYP2C9 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set) and tested on 2075 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85 External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81	No
CYP2D6 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set) and tested on 1068 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85 External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87	No
CYP3A4 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set) and tested on 2579 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85 External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86	No
Log Kp (skin permeation)? Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.	-6.12 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski? Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. MW ≤ 500 MLOGP ≤ 4.15 N or O ≤ 10 NH or OH ≤ 5	0.0
Ghose? Ghose filter: implemented from Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem. 160 ≤ MW ≤ 480 -0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6 40 ≤ MR ≤ 130 20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70	None
Veber? Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem. Rotatable bonds ≤ 10 TPSA ≤ 140	0.0
Egan? Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem. WLOGP ≤ 5.88 TPSA ≤ 131.6	0.0
Muegge? Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem. 200 ≤ MW ≤ 600 -2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5 TPSA ≤ 150 Num. rings ≤ 7 Num. carbon > 4 Num. heteroatoms > 1 Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15 H-bond acc. ≤ 10 H-bond don. ≤ 5	1.0
Bioavailability Score? Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat implemented from Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.	0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS? Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.	0.0 alert
Brenk? Structural Alert: implemented from Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem	0.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness? Leadlikeness: implemented from Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 250 ≤ MW ≤ 350 XLOGP ≤ 3.5 Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7	No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility? Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult) based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties, trained on 12’782’590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r² = 0.94)	1.47

Application In Synthesis of [ 10010-93-2 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

Downstream synthetic route of [ 10010-93-2 ]

[ 10010-93-2 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream 1~1

1
[ 105-36-2 ]
[ 10010-93-2 ]
[ 345637-71-0 ]

Yield	Reaction Conditions	Operation in experiment
		EXAMPLE 2. Preparation of N-methyl-2-[1-[[5-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]acetyl]-4-piperidinyl]-N-[(1R)-1-phenylpropyl]-4-thiazolecarboxamide (Compound 117) Step A: Preparation of 5-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-acetic acid. A mixture of 3-methyl-5-trifluoromethylpyrazole (10.0 g, 66.7 mmol), ethyl bromoacetate (11.1 mL, 100 mmol) and potassium carbonate (18.4 g, 133 mmol) in 80 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide was stirred at ambient temperature overnight. The orange mixture was filtered, diluted with ethyl acetate, washed with water and brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure to give 15.7 g of the pyrazole ester. The ester, in 100 mL of tetrahydrofuran, was treated with 11 mL of a 50 % aqueous NaOH solution in 90 mL of water and stirred at ambient temperature overnight. The tetrahydrofuran was removed under reduced pressure and the aqueous solution was washed with ether and acidified with conc. HCl to pH 1 to give a precipitate. The precipitate was filtered, washed with water and dried to give 12.1 g of the title compound as a white solid. 1H NMR (Acetone-d6) delta 2.35 (s, 3H), 5.07 (s, 2H), 6.45 (s, 1H).

References: [1]Patent: WO2007/14290,2007,A2 .Location in patent: Page/Page column 55-56.

Details

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “3-Methyl-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazole”

Products